<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Healthcare Data Solutions Blog &#187; Medical Billing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/category/medical-billing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stay Current And Compliant – Plan for New CMS Ruling</title>
		<link>http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/stay-current-and-compliant-%e2%80%93-plan-for-new-cms-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/stay-current-and-compliant-%e2%80%93-plan-for-new-cms-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Swidron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Health Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Data Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Part D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescriber Validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescriber Verification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescribers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released its 2012 Final Rule regarding prescriber identification number validation on Medicare Part D drug claims. In it, the CMS raises concerns regarding the large number of invalid prescriber identification numbers and the possibility of prescription fraud and drug abuse.
In response, the CMS is now requiring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/stay-current-and-compliant-%e2%80%93-plan-for-new-cms-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluating Medical Billing Services</title>
		<link>http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/evaluating-medical-billing-services/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/evaluating-medical-billing-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Swidron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Billing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Thorman, Senior Marketing Manager for Software Advice, does a very nice job laying out the critical components to evaluating medical billing services in his latest blog post.  I encourage anyone in the market to read this piece prior to making any decisions.
The full article can be found at http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/medical/how-to-evaluate-medical-billing-services-1042610/
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.healthcaredatasolutions.com/evaluating-medical-billing-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

